See http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/2461.html . -- Brad -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 11:08 AM To: Greg Jaxon Cc: Sonjoy Mondal; sv-bc@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Importing a enum from a package don't import enum variable?? When did you suggest that? I don't remember it. Is there a Mantis? Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Jaxon [mailto:Greg.Jaxon@synopsys.com] > Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 10:46 PM > To: Bresticker, Shalom > Cc: Sonjoy Mondal; sv-bc@eda.org > Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Importing a enum from a package don't import enum > variable?? > > Shalom, > > I've suggested adding a redundant scope for the enum labels which > anyone having a handle on the enum type can access using the scope > operator "enum_T::label_V". I it is the smartest way to integrate > many enum types in congested name spaces. You can import > pkg::my_boolean and cleanly use my_boolean::FALSE without conflicting > with the FALSE teeth or FALSE flags you're already using. > > Greg > > > Bresticker, Shalom wrote: > > Both are correct. > > > > The difference is that the scope of the structure member names is > only > > with the structure, whereas the scope of enum value names is the > entity > > in which the enum is declared. > > > > Shalom > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv- > bc@server.eda.org] > >> On Behalf Of Sonjoy Mondal > >> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 1:36 PM > >> To: sv-bc@server.eda.org > >> Subject: [sv-bc] Importing a enum from a package don't import enum > >> variable?? > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> can you Please let me know that if an enum is defined in a package > >> then while importing the enum from that package in a module,the > >> enum variable should also be imported or not. According to LRM > >> P1800.2005 > section > >> 19.2.2 it seems as it bug of LRM itself as it is showing that > >> importing a enum does not import the enum variable while for other > >> like > structure, > >> importing a structure import the structure member also so it seems > as > >> it > >> is bug of LRM . > >> so can you please let me know which one is correct. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Dhiraj > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > >> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Mar 10 14:56:17 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 10 2007 - 14:56:33 PST