Has there been any talk of how to handle the keywords in 1800-2008? The set of keywords in currently listed in Annex B of the P1800 draft is the same as the 1800-2005 keyword set. So if that remains the case, then the 1800-2005 and 1800-2008 keyword sets will be identical. If in fact there are no keywords added, this would be the first Verilog/SV revision to not have any keyword additions/changes. So there is no precedent for how `begin_keywords should handle 2 revisions with the same keywords. Should P1800-2008 Sec 21.12 add "1800-2008" as an acceptable value for version_specifier? And, P1800-2008 Sec 21.12.2 be modified to say "1800-2005" and "1800-2008" are the same, and both point to table 21-21? ~Alex Alex Gran Corporate Applications Engineer Customer Support Division Mentor Graphics Corporation The only 5 STAR support in EDA - Find out why at http:// <http://supportnet.mentor.com> supportnet.mentor.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Apr 4 15:38:46 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 04 2007 - 15:39:06 PDT