RE: [sv-bc] P1800 draft2 review : Sec 9 Processes

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Mon Apr 16 2007 - 22:49:53 PDT
Yes, and it is better at x-propagation, but it is less readable for
complex logic, you can't use case statements or void functions, and it
also creates latches as well as combinational logic.

 

Shalom

 

________________________________

From: Michael (Mac) McNamara [mailto:mcnamara@cadence.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:39 PM
To: Bresticker, Shalom; Gran, Alex; sv-bc@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] P1800 draft2 review : Sec 9 Processes

 

The declarative assign statement is also quite good at generating
combinatorial logic.

	 

	
________________________________


	From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Bresticker, Shalom
	Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:16 AM
	To: Gran, Alex; sv-bc@eda-stds.org
	Subject: RE: [sv-bc] P1800 draft2 review : Sec 9 Processes

	Hi,

	 

	9.1.2.2

	    This is a rather nit-picky thing.  Section 9.1.2.2 contains
the sentence "SystemVerilog provides a special always_comb procedure for
modeling combinational logic behavior."

	      What makes always_comb so special, does it think its
better than all the other types of processes? :-)

	     I think this sentence made more sense in 1800-2005 as way
of stating that always_comb was only in SV, not in plain old Verilog,
but in the merged document shouldn't all procedures be created equal?

	 

	[SB] Nope. always_comb is specially tailored for combinational
logic. You can use a plain always, but always_comb is recommended.
'special' means 'special purpose' or 'specialized'.

	 

	 

	 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Apr 16 22:50:33 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 16 2007 - 22:50:57 PDT