Date: Thu Jun 21 2007 - 09:18:48 PDT
Shalom, A good idea, but can we save it for after 2008? I haven't seen long import lists, and with the new export package feature, the list should get even shorter. Dave ________________________________ From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:58 PM To: Arturo Salz Cc: sv-bc@server.eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-bc] multiple package imports ok with me ________________________________ From: Arturo Salz [mailto:Arturo.Salz@synopsys.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 7:22 PM To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-bc@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-bc] multiple package imports Shalom, I wonder if perhaps explicit syntax may be better for this, for example: Import pckg1::(a , b) pack2::(c, d); Arturo ________________________________ From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2:09 AM To: sv-bc@eda.org Subject: [sv-bc] multiple package imports Hi, If one wants to explicitly import several declarations from a package, one must repeat the package name each time: import pkg::a, pkg::b ; It would be nice if it were possible to omit the package name on multiple items (not the first). The package name omission would indicate to take the preceding package name. E.g., import pkg1:a,b, pkg2:c,d ; This would be convenient when importing a long list of names, like not having to repeat port direction and type in a port list. Comments? Thanks, Shalom Shalom Bresticker Intel Jerusalem LAD DA +972 2 589-6852 +972 54 721-1033 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
