RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 1090: `undefineall

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Mon Jul 16 2007 - 20:48:18 PDT
The text of the current proposal already said,

"The `undefineall directive shall undefine all text macros previously
defined by the `define compiler directive."

It is possible to remove the additional sentence which refers to
command-line switches and to refine the wording of `undef ("The
directive `undef shall undefine a previously defined text macro.") to be
similar to this.
 

> It may still be helpful to keep it in mind while considering 
> the wording of this proposal.  It would be better not to say 
> that it undefines all macros, instead saying something about 
> eliminating the effects of `define directives.  Or that it 
> has the effect of a `undef applied to all defined macros.  
> However, the description of `undef may have already made this mistake.


Shalom

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Jul 16 20:48:42 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 16 2007 - 20:49:11 PDT