RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 1602: task/function default inout arguments

So far, I think Gord favors treating inout defaults as regular inout
arguments, whereas Jonathan and Brad seem to favor disallowing inout
defaults (which would be a change from the current LRM). Correct me if I
misunderstood. 

I'm not relating to the discussion on output defaults and leaving off
output args.

> But what do you (and Brad and everyone else) think about the 
> questions on Mantis 1602?

Let's hear from others. That's not enough for a consensus yet.

I remind you that a third approach is to treat inout defaults as inputs.
I think Steven Sharp advocated that.

Thanks,
Shalom

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.