[sv-bc] array/struct literals

Bresticker, Shalom writes:
 > This may be picky, but ...
 > 
 > 5.10 says, "Structure literals are structure assignment patterns or
 > pattern expressions with constant member expressions."

I don't see why structure literals are even mentioned.  They
are not literals in the sense of being primitive language
elements.  They are complex expressions that happen to be
made up of constant expressions.  If we have a section for
structure literals, then why not one for concat literals,
i.e., constant-valued concatenations?

Paul

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.