I thought a long time ago already that the sections on aggregate literals and on assignment patterns should be combined, as they largely duplicate each other. Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Graham [mailto:pgraham@cadence.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 4:09 PM > To: Bresticker, Shalom > Cc: sv-bc@eda.org > Subject: [sv-bc] array/struct literals > > Bresticker, Shalom writes: > > This may be picky, but ... > > > > 5.10 says, "Structure literals are structure assignment > patterns or > pattern expressions with constant member expressions." > > I don't see why structure literals are even mentioned. They > are not literals in the sense of being primitive language > elements. They are complex expressions that happen to be > made up of constant expressions. If we have a section for > structure literals, then why not one for concat literals, > i.e., constant-valued concatenations? > > Paul > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jul 19 06:14:46 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 19 2007 - 06:15:10 PDT