Brad, I am not sure that interface ports as such pose additional problems. The issues revolving around modports certainly do and neither Mark or I have incorporated those aspects in our discussion. But there are others issues in that space anyways. I think that it is important to focus on the core resolution questions and work out from there. It is far too easy to get buried otherwise. If we can't agree on rules for the simpler cases, we're have much deeper problems. Gord Brad Pierce wrote: > Another difficulty with SV name resolution, as noted in > > http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/4860.html , > > is that interface names (unlike type names) can be referred to in the > port list of a module before the interface has been declared. > > -- Brad > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Sep 4 08:23:40 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 04 2007 - 08:23:56 PDT