[sv-bc] RE: E-mail Ballot: Respond by Sun Sep 16 8am PDT

Thanks Shalom, I meant 1468.  Too late at night to be responding to
email IMHO:') -Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Bresticker, Shalom 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:22 AM
To: Alsop, Thomas R
Cc: 'sv-bc@eda-stds.org'
Subject: RE: E-mail Ballot: Respond by Sun Sep 16 8am PDT

I think you meant 1468.
1473 is the 1step issue.

Shalom 

> Yes on everything but 1473.  See comments below. Thanks, -Tom
> 

> SVDB 1468 _X_Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468
> 
> SVDB 1473 ___Yes   _X_No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468
> talsop - I don't see any difference in the new comments from 
> the comment that the always_latch "executes identically" to 
> the always_latch.  In the always_comb clause is states "The 
> variables written on the left-hand side of assignments shall 
> not be written to by any other process." And yet we are 
> adding this _and_ including the statement "from the contents 
> of all called function".  Isn't this true for always_comb 
> too?  From the emails threads this appears to be legacy 
> comments.  I think "executes identically" is good enough.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.