RE: [sv-bc] udp latch table

From: Jonathan Bromley <jonathan.bromley_at_.....>
Date: Wed Sep 19 2007 - 07:08:03 PDT
> Anyone object to reversing the clock values in the 
[transparent latch UDP] 
> table?
> It had me scratching my head when I tried to understand it.

The real confusion comes from inappropriate use of "clk" 
to name the transparent latch-enable input.  It's not
a clock in any useful sense of the word.

The example in question is far from alone in making this
odd mistake.

Traditional TTL and similar logic devices often use the
symbol "G" for such a latch-enable input.  It's not 
helpful, but at least it doesn't suggest a clock :-)

-- 
Jonathan Bromley

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Sep 19 07:15:42 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 19 2007 - 07:15:54 PDT