FW: [sv-bc] E-mal Vote: Respond by 8am PDT, Sunday Sep 30, 2007

I just noticed I only sent this to Matt and not to the reflector.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hartoog 
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 1:27 PM
To: 'Maidment, Matthew R'
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] E-mal Vote: Respond by 8am PDT, Sunday Sep 30, 2007

> SVDB  699 _X__Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=699
> 
> SVDB  907 _X__Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=907
> 
> SVDB 1035 _X__Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1035
> 
> SVDB 1228 _X__Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1228
> 
> SVDB 1425 _X__Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1425
> 
> SVDB 1468 _X__Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468
> 
> SVDB 1710 _X__Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1710
> 
> SVDB 1747 ___Yes   _X__No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1747

I think the proposed syntax is confusing. One might be lead to believe
that you could set one default net type for ports and a different
nettype for instances and contassigns.

> 
> SVDB 1846 _X__Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1846
> 
> SVDB 1940 _X__Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1940
> 
> SVDB 1949 _X__Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1949
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.