RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 907: Default parameter assignment should be optional

Mantis 1851 points out that *all* parameter_declarations within a class
are treated as localparams, regardless of the presence or absence of a
parameter_port_list.

Shalom
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 8:54 AM
> To: sv-bc@server.eda-stds.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] Mantis 907: Default parameter assignment 
> should be optional
> 
> In response to valuable feedback from our recent SV-BC 
> teleconference, I updated the proposal for the issue mentioned in --
> 
>      http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-ec/hm/4725.html
> 
> The updated proposal disallows omitting parameter default 
> values except within the "ANSI-style" #(...) declarations, 
> and it says that a module with a no-default-value parameter 
> cannot be a top-level module.
> 
> The updated proposal is attached.
> 
> -- Brad
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.