Re: [sv-bc] RESEND: Default Module Ports Proposal posted

From: Greg Jaxon <Greg.Jaxon_at_.....>
Date: Mon Oct 01 2007 - 12:03:45 PDT
Bresticker, Shalom wrote:
> Maybe more comprehensive would be to say something to the effect that
> the default is as though explicitly written in the instantiation. That
> would also answer questions like size extension, signing, etc.

That would be the wrong direction to send the reader.  Names in the default
expression do not resolve in the instantiation's scope.

Greg


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Oct 1 12:04:05 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 01 2007 - 12:04:24 PDT