NO ON 1588 - couldn't this be done with an enhancement to %m or maybe adding a system function like maybe $line and $file. Is the only solution to add more compiler directives? Yes on all others Maidment, Matthew R wrote: > -You have until 8am PDT, Sunday, October 14, 2007 to respond > -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible > voters respond with a YES vote. > -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason. > The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference > call. > -Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in the bug note > (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.). > > As of the October 1, 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are: > > Brad Pierce > Shalom Bresticker > Cliff Cummings > Mark Hartoog > Francoise Martinolle > Karen Pieper > Dave Rich > Steven Sharp > Gordon Vreugdenhil > Stu Sutherland > Alex Gran > Don Mills > Heath Chambers > Tom Alsop > > > SVDB 907 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=907 > > SVDB 1134 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1134 > > SVDB 1294 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1294 > > SVDB 1348 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1348 > > SVDB 1464 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1464 > > SVDB 1468 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468 > > SVDB 1588 ___Yes _X__No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1588 > > SVDB 1619 _x__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1619 > > SVDB 1792 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1792 > > SVDB 1940 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1940 > > SVDB 2024 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2024 > > SVDB 2056 _X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2056 > > -- ========================================================== Don Mills mills@lcdm-eng.com www.lcdm-eng.com ========================================================== -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Oct 10 10:58:18 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 10 2007 - 10:58:33 PDT