Re: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] [sv-ac] 1549 and inside operator

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Wed Oct 10 2007 - 11:00:42 PDT
>From: "Korchemny, Dmitry" <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>

>Maybe the problem is in the vague definition of 'inside' operator?
>Essentially it requires an argument list as its second argument, but SV
>does not have such a construct.

I am not sure what you mean by saying it is vague.  It appears clearly
specified.  What you are calling an argument list presumably refers to
the fact that it accepts multiple operands, not a single operand of an
explicit "set" type.  It does effectively allow bundling up multiple
operands into a single array operand, which can perform much the same
function.  That is what Gord's example does.

The only problem is that there is no way to construct an array value on
the fly, without an explicit array type or an assignment-like context to
provide that type.  Gord's example provided the explicit type.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Oct 10 11:01:03 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 10 2007 - 11:01:21 PDT