RE: [sv-cc] RE: [sv-bc] Stu's QUESTIONS and NOTES in Draft 4

I'm just surprised that IEEE Std 1800-2008 would refer to 1800-2005 as
the canonical value.
 
Shalom


________________________________

	From: Jim Vellenga [mailto:vellenga@cadence.com] 
	Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:46 PM
	To: Bresticker, Shalom; Warmke, Doug; sv-bc@eda.org
	Cc: SV-CC
	Subject: RE: [sv-cc] RE: [sv-bc] Stu's QUESTIONS and NOTES in
Draft 4
	
	
	As far as I'm concerned, it's close enough.  The use of
	the VPI-based canonical value (whatever that means) came
	in with 1800-2005.  You can argue with the sentence on
	other grounds, and if someone wants to tweak it, I wouldn't
	object to adding the proposal to the queue.  But I think
	we have more important issues to consider.
	 
	Regards,
	Jim
	 

	---------------------------------------------------------
	James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381
	Software Architect                              (FAX)
978-262-6636
	Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com
	270 Billerica Rd
	Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
	"We all work with partial information."
	---------------------------------------------------------- 

	 


________________________________

		From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org]
On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
		Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 3:28 PM
		To: Warmke, Doug; sv-bc@eda.org
		Cc: SV-CC
		Subject: RE: [sv-cc] RE: [sv-bc] Stu's QUESTIONS and
NOTES in Draft 4
		
		
		But is it proper to call 1800-2005 "the VPI-based
canonical value"?
		 
		Shalom


________________________________

			From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Warmke, Doug
			Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 9:25 PM
			To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-bc@server.eda.org
			Cc: SV-CC
			Subject: [sv-cc] RE: [sv-bc] Stu's QUESTIONS and
NOTES in Draft 4
			
			

			I thought about that, but I think it's OK the
way it is.

			It is just an example.  If someone cares about
it enough,

			I'm sure no one would object to a Mantis and
proposal.

			 

			Thanks,

			Doug

			 

			From: Bresticker, Shalom
[mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
			Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 12:21 PM
			To: Warmke, Doug; sv-bc@server.eda.org
			Cc: SV-CC
			Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Stu's QUESTIONS and NOTES
in Draft 4

			 

			It sounds like the following text should change
as well:

			The svDpiVersion() function returns a string
indicating which DPI standard is supported by the simulator

			and in particular which canonical value
representation is being provided. For example, a tool that is based on

			IEEE Std 1800-2005, i.e., the VPI-based
canonical value, must return the string "1800-2005"

			Shalom

			 

				I.9.1.3  I think we should change the
comment to read as follows:

				/*

				 * Returns one of the following version
strings:

				 * "1800-2008"

				 * "1800-2005"

				 * "SV3.1a"

				 */

				const char* svDpiVersion();

				 

				I filed Mantis 2101 and uploaded a
proposal for this one.

				SV-CC should add this to their list of
items at the next meeting.

				(It's trivial)

				 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
			Intel Israel (74) Limited
			 
			This e-mail and any attachments may contain
confidential material for
			the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
review or distribution
			by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended
			recipient, please contact the sender and delete
all copies.

			-- 
			This message has been scanned for viruses and 
			dangerous content by MailScanner
<http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is 
			believed to be clean. 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
		Intel Israel (74) Limited
		
		This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
material for
		the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
distribution
		by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended
		recipient, please contact the sender and delete all
copies.
		

		-- 
		This message has been scanned for viruses and 
		dangerous content by MailScanner
<http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is 
		believed to be clean. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.