Re: [sv-bc] Unconnected ports using .name implicit ports (SVDB 1660??)

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Tue Oct 16 2007 - 16:03:26 PDT
>From: Don Mills <mills@lcdm-eng.com>
>
> Even though .name() is not required for unconnected ports, when using
> the .name connection style, it (the .name()) could still be used if the
> designer chooses to, right?

Sure.  The LRM describes .name as being equivalent to .name(name), 
with a few special exceptions.  That imposes no restrictions on the
other port connections.

In fact, one of the examples in that section does exactly that.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Oct 16 16:03:43 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 16 2007 - 16:03:52 PDT