RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST

On 1339, completely avoiding Brad's problem (which I had seen earlier,
but decided to leave) could be:

"Any white space characters at the beginning or end of the macro text
will be removed."

(Should not be a hyphen in "white space").

Shalom
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Alsop, Thomas R
> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 2:24 AM
> To: Brad Pierce; sv-bc@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST
> 
> Brad, on 1339 do you have a suggestion on how to reword this?
> 
> "Any white-space characters preceding or following the macro 
> text are not considered part of the macro text."
> 
> What would you call the macro entity before we remove the pre 
> and post white space? 
> 
> Maybe we can just say this instead:
> 
> "Any white-space characters preceding or following the macro 
> text will be removed from the macro text."
> 
> On 1619, what percentage of the SV consumer population would 
> you say uses non-ANSI ports?  Is this something we can address later?
> 
> -Tom
> 
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On 
> >Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> >Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:36 PM
> >To: sv-bc@server.eda.org
> >Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST
> >
> >Matt,
> >
> >I vote Yes on all except
> >
> >>SVDB 1339 ___Yes   _XX__No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1339
> >
> >  Reason -- The proposal would add "Any white-space characters
> preceding
> >or following the macro text are not considered part of the 
> macro text."
> >This sentence is tautological, because what precedes or 
> follows a thing 
> >cannot be part of that thing.  Also, there should be a concrete
> example.
> >
> >>SVDB 1571 ___Yes   __XX_No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1571
> >
> > Reasons --
> >
> >   1) (Twice) In '"=" symbol', the '=' is not a symbol, but a token,
> and
> >it shouldn't be in quotations.
> >
> >   2)  In Syntax 21-2, the = should be bold red.
> >
> > If these were corrected, I would withdraw my 'No' and vote 'Yes'.
> >
> >>SVDB 1619 ___Yes   _XX__No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1619
> >
> >  Reason -- Some SystemVerilog users strongly prefer using non-ANSI 
> >style port declarations, so I cannot accept the ANSI-only 
> restriction.
> >
> >>SVDB 2102 ___Yes   _XX__No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2102
> >
> >  Reasons -- I find the proposed language confusing. As 
> Shalom asked, 
> >why can't I have multiple continuous assignments to the same 
> element as 
> >long as they are to different bits?  Also, it's not clear that it's 
> >still illegal to mix procedural and continuous assignments 
> to the same 
> >bit. (Or is that to the same element? I can't tell.)
> >
> >>
> >>SVDB 2106 ___Yes   _XX__No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2106
> >
> >  Reasons -- I'm fine with this, except that I don't understand the 
> >first sentence. "A typedef may be used to give an existing 
> data type a 
> >user defined name, or to re-name another user-defined data 
> type." Why 
> >would the user-defined data type not be an existing type 
> unless you had 
> >a situation like
> >
> >        typedef struct {int x;} T;
> >
> >  in which case you would not be re-naming the type, but 
> naming it for 
> >the first time.
> >
> >
> >-- Brad
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of 
> >Maidment, Matthew R
> >Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:12 AM
> >To: sv-bc@eda.org
> >Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST
> >
> >I forgot to include:
> >
> >SVDB 2217 ___Yes   ___No
> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2217
> >
> >--
> >Matt Maidment
> >mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of 
> >>Maidment, Matthew R
> >>Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:03 AM
> >>To: sv-bc@eda.org
> >>Subject: [sv-bc] e-mail ballot: respond by Dec 3, 8am PST
> >>
> >>
> >>-You have until 8am PST, Monday, December 3, 2007 to 
> respond -An issue 
> >>passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible  voters 
> >>respond with a YES vote.
> >>-If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a 
> >>reason.
> >> The issue will then be up for discussion during a future 
> conference 
> >>call.
> >>-Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in the bug
> note
> >>       (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.).
> >>
> >>As of the November 12, 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are:
> >>
> >>Brad Pierce
> >>Shalom Bresticker
> >>Cliff Cummings
> >>Mark Hartoog
> >>Francoise Martinolle
> >>Karen Pieper
> >>Dave Rich
> >>Steven Sharp
> >>Gordon Vreugdenhil
> >>Stu Sutherland
> >>Alex Gran
> >>Don Mills
> >>Heath Chambers
> >>Tom Alsop
> >>Doug Warmke
> >>Mike Burns
> >>
> >>SVDB  329 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=329
> >>
> >>SVDB 1338 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1338
> >>
> >>SVDB 1339 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1339
> >>
> >>SVDB 1548 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1548
> >>
> >>SVDB 1571 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1571
> >>
> >>SVDB 1619 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1619
> >>
> >>SVDB 1957 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1957
> >>
> >>SVDB 2102 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2102
> >>
> >>SVDB 2106 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2106
> >>
> >>SVDB 2152 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2152
> >>
> >>SVDB 2163 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2163
> >>
> >>SVDB 2169 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2169
> >>
> >>SVDB 2170 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2170
> >>
> >>SVDB 2178 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2178
> >>
> >>SVDB 2184 ___Yes   ___No
> >>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2184
> >>
> >>--
> >>This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> >>MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> >>
> >
> >--
> >This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> >MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> >MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.