How could a variable at design unit scope be automatic? What would that mean? I thought a variable could only be automatic if it were declared in a procedural context, such as a task or an always procedure. -- Brad -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Surya Pratik Saha Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 8:40 PM To: Mark Hartoog Cc: sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org; Adhip Das Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Is interface ref variable automatic? Hi Mark, I am not fully satisfied with your response. Because in SV 1800 LRM, 'ref' arguments are discussed only in Task-Function section, no where else. But module/interface/program can also have 'ref' arguments. So we can not conclude the behaviour mentioned in LRM is only for Task-function. LRM should be clear on that. What do you think. I don't want to make any assumption. Regards Surya -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re:[sv-ec] Is interface ref variable automatic? From: Mark Hartoog <Mark.Hartoog@synopsys.com> To: Surya Pratik Saha <spsaha@cal.interrasystems.com>, sv-bc@eda.org, sv-ec@eda.org Cc: "Adhip Das" <adhip@cal.interrasystems.com> Date: Thursday, December 13, 2007 1:30:10 AM > This example is legal. Section 12.4.2 is talking about ref arguments > to tasks and functions. In your example you have a ref port on an > interface. You cannot attach a automatic variable to a ref port of a > module, interface or program, so no such restriction exists for ref > ports. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of >> Surya Pratik Saha >> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 12:43 AM >> To: sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org >> Cc: Adhip Das >> Subject: [sv-ec] Is interface ref variable automatic? >> >> Hi, >> >> Consider the following testcase, >> >> interface intf (ref bit [3:0] ba); >> endinterface >> >> module named1 (); >> bit [3:0] ba; >> assign o1 = i2.ba; >> intf i2 (ba); >> endmodule >> >> As per systemverilog LRM 1800-2005, section 12.4.2 Pass by reference: >> >> "Because a variable passed by reference may be an automatic variable, >> a ref argument shall not be used in any context forbidden for >> automatic variables." >> >> Could you please tell me whether the above testcase is erroneous or >> not? >> I guess, it is erroneous because ref variable(which should be treated >> as automatic variable) is hierarchically referred(i2.ba). >> >> -- >> Regards >> Surya >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by >> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. >> >> >> > > > > > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Dec 12 22:00:06 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 12 2007 - 22:01:00 PST