RE: [sv-bc] Constant method calls

This one looks to me as an oversight. As an LRM reader, I tend to rely
on the more general and more intuitive (to me) 6.19.5 header, which
doesn't restrict the methods to variables, than to this sentence
specific to next().

 

--Yulik.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bresticker, Shalom 
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 9:52 AM
To: Feldman, Yulik
Cc: 'sv-bc@server.eda.org'; 'sv-ec@server.eda.org'
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Constant method calls

 

The LRM also says,

 

"The next() method returns the Nth next enumeration value (default is
the next one) starting from the current value of the given variable."

 

So it is a method of a variable.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.