RE: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] svlog enum function usage & maven query

Brad,

This was discussed in the recent past by email, with no resolution. I
don't think there is any strong evidence in the LRM that this was
intended to be allowed. There is no statement to that effect, nor is
there any such example. Such a feature would not be a corner case, but a
fundamental part of the method functionality, and it would have had to
be stated explicitly.

I opened Mantis 2272 on this.

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:14 PM
> To: sv-ec@server.eda.org; sv-bc@server.eda.org; 
> sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] svlog enum function usage & 
> maven query
> 
> Greg,
> 
>    primary ::= function_subroutine_call
>            ::= subroutine_call
>            ::= method_call
> 
> The LRM says "The next() method returns the Nth next 
> enumeration value (default is the next one) starting from the 
> current value of the given VARIABLE."
> 
> However, this is probably a mistake and in fact, the method 
> can be used with any enumeration value, even an anonymous 
> one, and Kapil's example is actually legal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.