RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 2360

I vote yes on 2360 with Shalom's friendly amendments.  Also, I wonder if
the following proposed addition is really necessary in an LRM

 

   "Note that encrypting keys with a symmetric cipher is not a common
use case."

 

n  Brad

 

From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 10:27 PM
To: sv-bc
Subject: [sv-bc] Mantis 2360

 

I vote yes on Mantis 2360, but with minor editorial comments:

1. The subclause numbers have to be updated to Draft 5. The second-level
subclause numbers have increased by one, due to the addition on 33.1.
So for example, 33.4.11.1 becomes 33.5.11.1.

2. The proposal refers to "cipher-block chaining" whereas Table 33-3
refers to "cbc" and "CBC mode". The first reference to "cipher-block
chaining" in the text should add "(CBC)" in order to connect the two
forms.

Regards,

Shalom

Shalom Bresticker

Intel Jerusalem LAD DA

+972 2 589-6582

+972 54 721-1033

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.