[sv-bc] Re: [sv-sc] Ballot issues concerning checkers

Hi Dmitry,

It is very possible that some of the issues were categorized into
the wrong committees. This will become apparent as the Technical
Committees finish their reviews. The chairs of the committees
should feel free to notify other committees of any items that
appear to be miscategorized.

We just need to make sure that none of the items fall through
the cracks.


Neil



On 04/07/09 01:09, Korchemny, Dmitry wrote:
> Hi Karen, Neil,
> 
>  
> 
> In the Excel sheet there are several issues with checkers related to SV-SC:
> 
>  
> 
> Item 80:               Mantis 2513: According to LRM checkers may be 
> declared in packages. But this fact is not reflected in BNF
> 
> Item 159:             Mantis 2562: rand qualifier for checker variables 
> is not reflected in BNF. It is written in 17.7 Checker variables 
> “Checker variables may have an optional rand qualifier.”, but this is 
> not reflected in the BNF: checker_or_generate_item_declaration ::= 
> data_declaration
> 
> But it should be: checker_or_generate_item_declaration ::= [rand] 
> data_declaration
> 
> Need also to check the VPI.
> 
>  
> 
> But the specified owner of Item 80 is SV-BC, and of Item 159 is SV-EC.
> 
>  
> 
> Was it done on purpose?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmitry
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.