I have uploaded a proposal for 2677 to allow multiple forward type declarations and to allow forward type declarations before and after the type definition. Gord. Brad Pierce wrote: > SV-BC Ballot Comment Resolution Meeting > Date: Monday, June 01, 2009 > Time: 9:00am-11:00am PDT > > Toll Free Dial In Number in North America: 1-888-813-5316 > Caller Paid Dial In Number: 1-650-584-6338 > Meeting ID: 7839818 > > Agenda > > + Review IEEE patent policy > http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt > > + Review Previous Meeting Minutes > http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/minutes/sv-bc_09_05_11.txt > > + 2380 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2380) > Transferred to SV-EC, still time to give them your input. > http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/9558.html > > + 2593 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2593) > Proposal rejected by Champions; resolve with boilerplate? > > + 2678 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2668) > Has tentative proposal, but not a consensus yet. > > + 2721 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2721) > Has tentative proposal, but not a consensus yet. > > + 2677 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2667) > Anyone care to write a proposal? (See bug notes for additional info) > > + 2690 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2690) > Appears to be resolved by Mantis 1492 > http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=1492 > > + 2663 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2663) > Appears to be addressed by response to reflector > http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/9383.html > > + 2664 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2664) > Appears to be addressed by response to reflector > http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/9384.html > > + 2665 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2665) > Appears to be addressed by response to reflector > http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/9385.html > > + 2666 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2666) > Anyone care to write a proposal based on proposal in description? > > + 2667 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2667) > Anyone care to write a proposal based on proposal in description? > > + 2668 (http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2668) > Anyone care to write a proposal based on proposal in description? > > + 2669 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2669) > Can it be addressed by > 1) Stating the desired comment about file ordering is addressed in 3.14.2.2 > 2) Deprecation either will not be done or will only be considered for future revision > > + 2697 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2697) > Consider denying altogether or for at least this round. What about > suggesting alternate means for getting the parameter values, e.g.: > $bits of variables declared with those parameters > > + 2720 (http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2720) > Anyone care to write a proposal? (See bug notes for additional info) > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri May 29 09:48:59 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 29 2009 - 09:49:58 PDT