RE: [sv-bc] E-mail Ballot Due Monday, June 8, 8AM PDT

The quoted text is by Cliff.

-- Brad

________________________________________
From: Gordon Vreugdenhil [gordonv@model.com]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 7:34 AM
To: Brad Pierce
Cc: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-bc] E-mail Ballot Due Monday, June 8, 8AM PDT

Brad Pierce wrote:
[...]

>
> If I understand the proposal correctly, it just says you can have as
> many forward typedefs in a scope and put them anywhere, although the
> practice seems faulty and confusing to me. It only allows for one
> final type definition, which is then applied to all forward typedefs,
> wherever they might be placed within the same scope. Is this correct?

Yes that is correct.  The practice is certainly confusing; the only
reason to allow it is to allow use of include files with forward
types and where includes of the file may follow the actual type.
I don't like that practice, but don't think there is good reason to
outlaw it.

Gord.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.