Cliff, I had considered your wording suggestion almost exactly when I wrote the proposal and rejected the wording since an "enum" is also integral and wouldn't be a legal override. I played around with the wording a bit at the time -- I thought about ...the evaluation of p2 shall be illegal unless a parameter override with a type compatible with the default value occurs. and a few variants of the same but ended up with the more general wording in the proposal since I didn't like any of the other versions. So, I would object to the "integral" suggestion but would be fine with other suggestions that would be correct and everyone prefers. Gord. Clifford E. Cummings wrote: [...]> > WAS: > Similarly, since T2 requires an instantiation override, the evaluation > of p2 shall only occur with the type defined by the parameter override. > > PROPOSED: > Similarly, since T2 requires an instantiation override, the evaluation > of p2 shall be illegal unless a parameter override with an integral type > occurs. > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Jun 8 07:50:10 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 08 2009 - 07:50:25 PDT