I don't see a reason it should be illegal. It would be reasonable for a tool to allow an optional warning in this case. Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Dhiraj Kumar Prasad > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 10:09 AM > To: sv-bc@server.eda.org > Cc: Dhiraj Kumar Prasad > Subject: [sv-bc] Query related with export statement inside > the package. > > Hi, > > Is the following testcase is legal ? > > package p; > export p::*; > endpackage > > module tmp; > endmodule > > As some of the standard tool's are showing error for this.LRM section > 26.6,don't say anything > about the behavior when there is nothing to export. > > Regards, > dhiRAj --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Sep 15 01:15:53 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 15 2009 - 01:16:58 PDT