RE: [sv-bc] Re: [sv-ac] checker: Clarification on functions & side effects

From: <jonathan.bromley_at_.....>
Date: Fri Oct 02 2009 - 07:54:14 PDT
> Is there any objection to us creating a public SV errata/commentary 
> wiki, where we could organize these things in a quickly acceesible 
> way?  Such a page would be unofficial, but might be quite useful. 

Some while after the VHDL standard 1076-1987 was first published,
the relevant committee published an "Interpretations" document
for just this kind of reason.  I know that it was published as
an IEEE doc, but presumably it did not have the status of a 
formal standard.  So, at the very least, there is a precedent.
-- 
Jonathan Bromley


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Oct 2 07:56:52 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 02 2009 - 07:57:39 PDT