Please forward any meeting minute corrections to me. Since we have sought to alert a broader set of people to our planning for the next revision or changes to the SystemVerilog standard, I have included the subgroups on the meeting minutes as well. -Dennis ________________________________ IEEE P1800 SystemVerilog Working Group UNAPPROVED MINUTES 10 December 2009 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. PST Teleconference 1 CALL TO ORDER - INTRODUCTIONS & AFFILIATIONS The meeting was called to order at 8:01 a.m. PST. Member DRs/DRAs Present: Dennis Brophy (Mentor Graphics, DR) Mehdi Mohtashemi (Synopsys, DR) Karen Pieper (Accellera, DR) Daniel Even-haim (Intel DR) Neil Korpusik (Sun, DR) Steven Dovich (Cadence, DR) Member DRAs Present: Yatin Trivedi (Synopsys DRA) Brad Pierce (Synopsys DRA) Dave Rich (Mentor Graphics DRA) Observers: JL Gray (Verilab) Michiel Ligthart (Verific Design Automation) Nikhil Rishiyur (Bluespec) Shalom Bresticker (Intel) Peter Flake (Elda Technology Ltd) 2 Approve agenda A motion (Dennis Brophy, Mehdi Mohtashemi) was made to approve the agenda. The motion passed unanimously. 3 Patent Policy and Call for Patents Chair Pieper read the IEEE patent policy to the group and displayed it on the WebEx. The patents slides can be found here <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt> . 4 Approval of Minutes * Minutes of the September 3, 2009 Meeting * http://www.eda.org/sv-ieee1800/hm/0919.html * Minutes of the September 10 Continuation, 2009 Meeting * http://www.eda.org/sv-ieee1800/hm/0944.html A motion (Neil Korpusik, Yatin Trivedi) was made to approve the minutes. The motion passed unanimously. 5 Funding, Budgeting, and Financial Update There was a small amount of money from our budget that was not spent. We are looking at an honorarium for Shalom who took over for Stu for the final IEEE edit review. We also want to hold a celebration dinner as well for the working group participants at DVCon. 6 Editing Update Shalom reports that Kathryn Burger is the IEEE editor for the standard. She made many necessary corrections and asked Shalom to review those changes to complete the publication version of the standard. Shalom also answered many questions that she had in preparation for publication. There were many editorial corrections that were needed to the LRM. Shalom has not yet heard from Kathryn about a final review of edits she made after his last conversations with her last Thursday. The standard is nearing completion for publication. Dennis will work with the IEEE to create a press release on publication, noting there was also a press release scheduled upon IEEE SA approval. Status on both of these will be reported back to the group. It appears that publication may occur close to IEEE approval that these can be combined into one. 7 Ballot update We are done! Karen says thank you to the group. Dennis says thanks to Karen for her leadership. Karen says thanks to Neil for an "A+" job as vice-chair as well thanks to all his sub-chairs. 8 Schedule Status Update * October 19, 2009 Submission deadline for IEEE Standards Board Meeting 12/7-9 * December 7-9, 2009 IEEE Standards Board Meeting, Piscataway, NJ * December 10, 2009 Teleconference 8am * December 15, 2009 Initiate press release to announce IEEE-SA Approval * January 14, 2009 Teleconference 8am * March 30, 2010 Initiate press release to announce Publication available 9 Discussion of new PAR The existing PAR is inactive, but extant, so we can develop our next PAR without a study group. The PAR reviewed at the meeting is found at http://www.eda.org/sv-ieee1800/hm/0932.html. In general, there is a group of people that want a short-term (two year) project to fix issues with the standard. There is a group of people that want to consider enhancements as well as correcting issue with the standard done within 4 years. Then there are others that want corrections and some enhancements done in the next two years as well. Should there be a cutoff date for enhancements and donations? Should we open multiple PARs, one for errata and clarifications and one PAR for enhancements? Could that be run in parallel or serial? Should we know what we want to do first, and then create the needed PAR(s) to accomplish the work? Should we keep the scope broad to handle that which we cannot know or predict today? There was no resolution to these questions. We plan to meet and convene a larger congress of suppliers and consumers to discuss the next steps to take. To prepare for this meeting, the subgroups can meet to prepare their presentations which will include the need to examine open Mantis items to address questions of interpretation and identify those which might require enhancements. A list of possible major enhancements includes (1) AMS Extensions, (2) System level design, (3) IP Encryption and alignment with P1735, and (4) enhancement to implement clarifications. Brad Pierce will send out information to a broader set of the industry to join in this discussion and participate live or on the web at the DVCon meeting. Dennis will work on host logistics. The meeting will be held at Mentor Graphics, near the DoubleTree hotel, the DVCon conference hotel. 10 P1800 technical committees and Champions operational update The committees are authorized to meet and address open questions and develop a list of enhancements that are important for the next standard for presentation at DVCon. The committee can propose resolutions for later consideration for open issues and questions in the Mantis database. 11 New Business None. 12 Next meeting (announce date, time, and location, if known) January 14, 2009 P1800 Meeting teleconference 8:00 a.m. PST 13 Adjournment A motion (Dennis Brophy) was made to adjourn the meeting. The end of the agenda being reached, no second was needed and the meeting adjourned at 10:03 a.m. PST. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Dec 10 12:12:58 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 10 2009 - 12:17:16 PST