RE: [sv-bc] Please respond with your #1 SV-BC enhancement priority (due by end of January)

Gordon:
> Much more importantly, I think that BC needs to take a serious look
> at issues such as the macro language, the composition of configurations
> in the presence of library management, the concept of libraries as
> applied to configurations and "-v" or similar pragmatic realities,
> and the entire concept of separate compilation and what that might mean.

I agree this is an area the needs a lot of work.

I think the question of binding interfaces, interface ports and virtual interface variables with multiple libraries and configurations is a hole in the current LRM that is affection customer designs.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.