Re: [sv-bc] Please respond with your #1 SV-BC enhancement priority (due by end of January)

From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv@model.com>
Date: Tue Jan 26 2010 - 14:28:11 PST

Mark Hartoog wrote:
> Gordon:
>> Much more importantly, I think that BC needs to take a serious look
>> at issues such as the macro language, the composition of configurations
>> in the presence of library management, the concept of libraries as
>> applied to configurations and "-v" or similar pragmatic realities,
>> and the entire concept of separate compilation and what that might mean.
>
> I agree this is an area the needs a lot of work.
>
> I think the question of binding interfaces, interface ports and virtual interface variables with multiple libraries and configurations is a hole in the current LRM that is affection customer designs.

Definitely. As most of you know, one of my big soap-boxes is
how users should expect various aspects of SV to compose
in realistic environments. Mark's list is a big part of
that as are things like assertions, etc. Some of the nastier
bits will likely need wider AC/EC discussion, but I think that
some of the core questions (and directions) should at least
be initiated by BC.

Gord.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Jan 26 14:29:12 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 26 2010 - 14:29:18 PST