RE: [sv-bc] changing the lifetime of begin end block

From: Daniel Mlynek <daniel.mlynek@aldec.com.pl>
Date: Fri Feb 12 2010 - 00:26:17 PST

OK thx.

As I saw in discussion this is not only single reader problem but also
different tools have different results.
I've add mantis to clear those 2 sentences:
http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=2978

DANiel

-----Original Message-----
From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 7:54 AM
To: Daniel Mlynek; jwill@BasicISP.net; sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] changing the lifetime of begin end block

We answered this.

6.21 is the subclause that defines this normatively.

23.2.1 just contains an informative high-level description of the module
header. This sentence can be changed since it creates a confusion in at
least one reader.

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Mlynek [mailto:daniel.mlynek@aldec.com.pl]
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 8:01 AM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom; jwill@BasicISP.net; sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] changing the lifetime of begin end block
>
> I think that in whole disciussion you've forget about my orginal
> doubt.
> Which is : is automatic lifetime defined for module should change the
> lifetime of the variable defined in begin...end blocks in
> always/initial processes?
> LRM 1800-2009 says: "The module header defines the following: - The
> default lifetime (static or automatic) of subroutines defined within
> the module"
> If this lifetime from module header should change also lifetime of
> variables from begin...end blocks then above sentence should be
> changed. If not then it is ok.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Feb 12 00:26:28 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 12 2010 - 00:26:31 PST