Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Proposal for ERR_56 and ERR-57
From: Warmke, Doug (doug_warmke@mentorg.com)
Date: Fri Dec 12 2003 - 09:05:17 PST
David,
Thanks for taking up this action item.
Comments:
1. Section 13.1, "the built-in package" is referenced.
I would prefer to name this either "the std package", or "the
built-in std package".
2. Did you consider adding the List class and its members to the std
package?
Right now that is accessed by including "standard header"
List.vh...
Thanks and regards,
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
David W. Smith
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 12:05 PM
To: sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] Proposal for ERR_56 and ERR-57
Greetings,
I have just posted a proposal for both cleaning up the use of built-in
package within the LRM and adding a new appendix listing the contents of
the current std built-in package. The proposal is found at:
http://www.eda.org/sv-ec/Errata/ERR_56_57.pdf
<http://www.eda.org/sv-ec/Errata/ERR_56_57.pdf> .
Please review before Monday's meeting.
Regards
David
David W. Smith
Synopsys Scientist
Synopsys, Inc.
Synopsys Technology Park
2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
Hillsboro, OR 97124
Voice: 503.547.6467
Main: 503.547.6000
FAX: 503.547.6906
Email: david.smith@synopsys.com <mailto:david.smith@synopsys.com>
<http://www.synopsys.com/> http://www.synopsys.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 09:06:21 PST