Re: Enumeration Proposals


Subject: Re: Enumeration Proposals
From: Peter Flake (flake@co-design.com)
Date: Wed Dec 05 2001 - 05:44:07 PST


Hi, Cliff,

Yes, c = 8.

Yes, it is an error to have two values the same.

I am unhappy about having a range on an enum to set the common size, since
this implies that it can be part selected. Do you want this?

To me, it is rather like integer[31:0], which has been removed.

Regards

Peter.

At 03:07 PM 11/29/01 -0800, Clifford E. Cummings wrote:
>Hi, All -
>
>Attached is a pdf document with proposals to update section 3.6 on
>Enumerations. I have added proposed clarification wording and there is a
>question regarding usage that is not documented well enough in the current
>Draft 3.
>
>Regards - Cliff
>
>
>
>
>//*****************************************************************//
>// Cliff Cummings Phone: 503-641-8446 //
>// Sunburst Design, Inc. FAX: 503-641-8486 //
>// 14314 SW Allen Blvd. E-mail: cliffc@sunburst-design.com //
>// PMB 501 Web: www.sunburst-design.com //
>// Beaverton, OR 97005 //
>// //
>// Expert Verilog, Synthesis and Verification Training //
>//*****************************************************************//



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Dec 05 2001 - 05:40:40 PST