Subject: RE: proposal pair for named port definitions
From: Michael McNamara (mac@verisity.com)
Date: Wed Apr 03 2002 - 08:52:13 PST
Stefen Boyd writes:
> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> Please vote for one of the following. We shouldn't
> leave the bnf the way it is since it doesn't reflect
> the intent of the enhancement. This should be on the
> issues list as it was tabled last week.
>
> 1) Strike named port connections from the ansi style
> port definitions (allowing jumpered ports in
> ansi style, just like K&R style).
I vote for the above. Mac
>
> 2) Enhance bnf for named port connections to allow
> multiple for each port direction:
> Was:
> inout_declaration ::= inout [ port_type ] list_of_port_identifiers
> | inout . port_identifier ( [ port_expression ] )
> Proposed:
> inout_declaration ::= inout [ port_type ] list_of_port_identifiers
> | inout . port_identifier ( [ port_expression ] ) [ , .
> port_identifier ( [ port_expression ] ) ]
>
>
> Regards,
> Stefen
>
>
> --------------------
> Stefen Boyd Boyd Technology, Inc.
> stefen@BoydTechInc.com (408)739-BOYD
> www.BoydTechInc.com (408)739-1402 (fax)
> [2 <text/html; us-ascii (7bit)>]
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 08:53:23 PST