Subject: proposal pair for named port definitions
From: Stefen Boyd (stefen@boyd.com)
Date: Mon Apr 01 2002 - 14:33:40 PST
Please vote for one of the following. We shouldn't
leave the bnf the way it is since it doesn't reflect
the intent of the enhancement. This should be on the
issues list as it was tabled last week.
1) Strike named port connections from the ansi style
port definitions (allowing jumpered ports in
ansi style, just like K&R style).
2) Enhance bnf for named port connections to allow
multiple for each port direction:
Was:
inout_declaration ::= inout [ port_type ] list_of_port_identifiers
| inout . port_identifier ( [ port_expression ] )
Proposed:
inout_declaration ::= inout [ port_type ] list_of_port_identifiers
| inout . port_identifier ( [ port_expression ] ) [ , .
port_identifier ( [ port_expression ] ) ]
Regards,
Stefen
--------------------
Stefen Boyd Boyd Technology, Inc.
stefen@BoydTechInc.com (408)739-BOYD
www.BoydTechInc.com (408)739-1402 (fax)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Apr 01 2002 - 14:40:40 PST