Subject: Re: proposal pair for named port definitions
From: Kevin Cameron x3251 (dkc@galaxy.nsc.com)
Date: Wed Apr 03 2002 - 10:02:26 PST
> Please vote for one of the following. We shouldn't
> leave the bnf the way it is since it doesn't reflect
> the intent of the enhancement. This should be on the
> issues list as it was tabled last week.
>
> 1) Strike named port connections from the ansi style
> port definitions (allowing jumpered ports in
> ansi style, just like K&R style).
>
> 2) Enhance bnf for named port connections to allow
> multiple for each port direction:
> Was:
> inout_declaration ::= inout [ port_type ] list_of_port_identifiers
> | inout . port_identifier ( [ port_expression ] )
> Proposed:
> inout_declaration ::= inout [ port_type ] list_of_port_identifiers
> | inout . port_identifier ( [ port_expression ] ) [ , .
> port_identifier ( [ port_expression ] ) ]
>
>
> Regards,
> Stefen
I vote for removing "jumpered ports", but it will need the addition
of some other short-circuit mechanism (either the previously mentioned
"alias" or "connect" statement).
Kev.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 10:04:22 PST