Re: FSM Section Vote?

Subject: Re: FSM Section Vote?
From: Kevin Cameron x3251 (dkc@galaxy.nsc.com)
Date: Wed Apr 03 2002 - 13:31:40 PST

• Next message: Clifford E. Cummings: ".name / .* and interface section proposals"
• Previous message: Paul Graham: "Proposal for array types"
• Maybe in reply to: Clifford E. Cummings: "FSM Section Vote?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> From owner-vlog-pp@eda.org Wed Apr 3 13:11:39 2002
>
> >Assuming Cliff's proposal passes, I would also like to make a related
> >proposal for e-mail vote (this will need a second).
> >PROPOSED: Remove "state" from the list of keywords in Annex B. Leave
> >"transition" in Annex B as a reserved word.
>
> I vote yes.
>
> >Stu
>
> -mac

Is it possible limit the scope in which new keywords are considered
keywords so that we get better backward compatibility?

Kev.
 

• Next message: Clifford E. Cummings: ".name / .* and interface section proposals"
• Previous message: Paul Graham: "Proposal for array types"
• Maybe in reply to: Clifford E. Cummings: "FSM Section Vote?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 13:35:11 PST