>Isn't this text from the LRM 19.11.4 explicit? Yes, it is. But reading through the errata will demonstrate that there have been many places where the LRM was explicit, and also wrong. However, it is apparently correct in this case. I'm not sure how I got a different impression. Thanks to everyone who replied to correct me. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Thu Mar 24 10:41:32 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 24 2005 - 10:41:37 PST