Date: Thu Oct 27 2005 - 07:24:53 PDT
Ah, I see now. 4.10.3 says that "Both the enumeration names and their integer values must be unique. The values can be set to any integral constant value, or auto-incremented from an initial value of 0. It is an error to set two values to the same name, or to set a value to the same auto-incremented value." But the special mention of this earlier was confusing and unnecessary. * 4.10, p.24: "If an automatically incremented value is assigned elsewhere in the same enumeration, this shall be a syntax error." (It may be an error, but I don't think it is an error of SYNTAX.) Is it an error to explicitly assign the same value to two enum names? It does not seem to say. Either way, it should be explicit. Shalom
