RE: [sv-bc] parameterized structures

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Thu Jun 15 2006 - 07:26:20 PDT

If someone wants to invest his time in writing a proposal for a useful
enhancement, I don't think we should reject it.

> I don't think we should be in the space of making this
> kind of extension right now since there are too many
> other things to be looking at, but I don't think this
> would be a stretch at all.
 
Shalom

Received on Thu Jun 15 07:26:43 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: [sv-bc] Defparam -- mixed message from IEEE standards"
Previous message: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: [sv-bc] parameterized structures"
Maybe in reply to: Feldman, Yulik: "[sv-bc] parameterized structures"
Next in thread: Rich, Dave: "RE: [sv-bc] parameterized structures"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 15 2006 - 07:26:47 PDT