I don't much care how this functionality is done as long as it is done. This is one that a lot of users want. Shalom > I vote against 1747. I don't oppose the concept but don't > like the form of the proposal. I'd prefer to have something > like `default_porttype and simply claim that it takes > precedence over `default_nettype if both are present. The > implied "none" for non-ports when we have "`default_nettype > ports_only wire" > is bound to be confusing. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Sep 28 00:53:00 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 28 2007 - 00:53:12 PDT