Subject: Re: List of 3.1 Items
From: Kevin Cameron x3251 (dkc@galaxy.nsc.com)
Date: Fri Apr 26 2002 - 16:49:01 PDT
> From owner-vlog-pp@eda.org Fri Apr 26 16:15:13 2002
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I had an action to review all the correspondence and meeting minutes, and
> come up with a list of items for which it was agreed that the discussion
> should be deferred to SystemVerilog 3.1.
>
> Here is the list based on every email where...
> Kevin, Mar02 - Dynamic process naming and control
If nobody has a major objection to this (or something like it), I would
recommend adding it in 3.0., otherwise I recommend removing dynamic
processes - never found relying on processes to commit suicide worked in
practice :-)
I don't think it's a good idea to leave "half baked" stuff in the LRM, it
just gives people something to object to if they want to reject the whole
thing.
Kev.
----- Begin Included Message -----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Apr 26 2002 - 16:56:14 PDT